![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
![]()
Open Document 3-1, which includes: (828 kb PDF download)
Controlled Leachate Recirculation World Symposium Paper presented 1993 Open Document 3-3 (127 kb download) Risk Based Model for Landfill Employees Study & Analysis 2001 The state of Minnesota is one of the few states which has required not only a study but the development of a health protocol to ensure worker safety. Hull and Associates, an independent engineering firm was hired to develop a Risked Based Health Evaluation Model to assess risk to employees based upon the chemical and organic constituency of the landfills leachate for NWC and its landfill customer base in Minnesota. Of particular importance to the health of the workers when spraying NWC's spectrum of cover materials is its viscosity, which limits the droplets sizes that can be inhaled. Further, because of the viscosity, when the ConCover materials are added to an odorous tank of leachate, the free waters are locked up by the polymers thus limiting evaporation and the escaping of the odor molecules into the atmosphere. It is readily apparent to the nose when ConCover materials are added to a tank as the odor drops immediately as the polymers unfold. The economic benefit of using leachate is found largely in cost avoidance arising out of not having to treat the leachate which is used as a blending medium. The water and thus, the leachate evaporates off the surface as the cover materials dry. Thus, the leachate is not added back to the landfill. Attached to this package is part of a financial analysis using the cost of the machine that applies the ConCover materials, as well as the operating costs (fuel, maintenance, labor and depreciation) to determine the annual operating and life cycle cost for a landfill that operates a 1000 square meter working face. The annual savings by using leachate for this small landfill would be nearly 50% of the annual operating costs. On a daily basis, the savings was nearly a cubic meter of leachate per day. For larger sites the savings could be even higher since the tank size could be upwards of 13,000 liters or 13 cubic meters of leachate per day savings. |
|
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |